Smuggled rum bought a farm and truck

Grandfather Best Bootlegger SAN

A Family Confession

by Donald Best

by Donald Best, former Sergeant, Detective, Toronto Police

As we discuss what is ethical behaviour and all the shades of right and wrong, I have a family confession: both my father and his father were bootleggers during the Depression and throughout World War II. Even as a decorated Chief Petty Officer during the Battle of the Atlantic, my father made considerable profits from smuggled rum and canned hams.

It could be fairly argued that smuggled rum and canned hams provided the financial foundation for several successful Best family businesses in Prince Edward Island and Ontario in the late 1940’s and early 1950’s. Indeed, it could also be said that the profits from bootleg liquor kept many a PEI family from starving during the dirty thirties. This, of course, was unbeknownst to the Women’s Christian Temperance Union wives (including my grandmother), who provided meals for the poor at the Freeland Presbyterian Church.

Profits from rum running also repaired the Freeland Presbyterian Church after the 1935 fire. Grandmother and the other womenfolk weren’t aware of the source of the re-construction funds even until they day they died. To this day my dear Aunts have no knowledge of this truth unless they read this post. Some family history is, to now, a male tradition.

The point of all this is that right and wrong, rule of law, ethics and law-breaking are not always a black/white either/or situation. Simple either/or solutions are not always possible in the real world.

That said; is is okay for lawyers to lie to the courts? Is it okay for police officers to illegally accept money from lawyers to work illegally for one side of a civil dispute?

Yes, there are shades of grey… but some behaviours can never be excused or explained away.

One comment

  • Exactly there are some things that cannot be overlooked and fabrication of evidence by lawyers, a corrupt police officer getting away with illegal acts a coward Judge that puts a man in prison based on fabricated evidence are very serious. Then a huge cover up involving other court judges and the CJC makes it that much more serious. Your posts regarding the non existent company that these lawyers represented that received one milion dollars and the Supreme Court never even raised an eyebrow causes an astronomical problem for the judicial system and for the Feds with respect to money laundering. Once again very serious allegations that the Courts have refused to acknowledge and law enforcement have failed to investigate.

    Of course dirty people in order to cover up their serious corruption will attack small acts of survival as you have shown occurred in your family during the depression and its really laughable when they do. The CRA will take issue with the expenses of a small business that a much larger company was allowed. That way they can tie up the system so certain companies can operate under the radar so to speak.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.